UXmatters: Towards a definition of experience design and a definition of customer experience
Thanks for visiting!
The April issue of UXmatters magazine is out and Dirk Knemeyer has written an article titled “Defining Experience: Clarity Amidst the Jargon“.
The word experience has gained significant traction over the past 15 years. Beginning with the mainstreaming of the term user experience in the software industry and, later, extended to the work of marketing professionals who began thinking about marketing as being experiential, the idea of experience as a focused professional area of endeavor is alive, well, and growing rapidly. However, the more our space grows, the more confused and chaotic is our collective understanding of the meaning of these terms. To try to help clarify this murkiness, I want to share my definitional model for the fields of experience and provide guidelines for the use of various terms.
This is an important step forward towards better definitions of the various terms in the field of designing experiences. After reading the article you will realize that one term is missing: customer experience. Since my blog is titled “The Customer Experience Labs” I feel obliged to add a definition for this term.
Customer Experience refers to all touchpoints people have from the moment they are aware of a need until they have fulfilled the need or reached a certain goal. While Brand Experience offers an “inside-out” perspective with a scope that is defined through the organization’s boundaries, Customer Experience takes an “outside-in” perspective and recognizes that there are more actors (organizations) involved when a customer is striving to reach a certain outcome.
One example:
Imagine you are planing your next flight and you will realize that there are more than a few different actors involved. You might have booked your ticket on a travel website like Expedia (Actor #1). You will have to arrive by train, bus or taxi (Actor #2). After arriving at the airport you have to find your check-in counter, check-in and kill time in one of the restaurants, bars or shops at the airport (Actor #3). When boarding the plane you have the first interaction with the airline (Actor #4) and after landing you interact with the destination airport (Actor #5) and public transportation to reach your destination (Actor #6).
All these interactions with different actors influence the Customer Experience. Organizations that adopt the customer’s point of view and look beyond the current organizational boundaries are able to create truly remarkable experiences. All these independent organizations can optimize their Brand Experience, but only by understanding the overall context in which customers are interacting them, an organization can become an “synchronized” actor in the system and remarkable Customer Experiences can be created.
Is it different from User Experience? Yes, since it is not just one specific design but all the experiences that a user (or customer) has in order to fulfill a need.
Is it different from Brand Experience? Yes, since it is and “outside-in” perspective from the customer’s point of view.
Subscribe here to automatically receive the next article via eMail.


Subscribe to the Customer Experience Labs RSS Feed
Subscribe to the Customer Experience Labs eMail Newsletter for free.




One Comment, Comment or Ping
Linda Ireland
Dirk Knemeyer’s definition of customer experience is valuable not only for its clarity, but also because it forces us to see experience from the customer’s point of view. He alludes to four big ideas most experience definitions miss:
1) “All the touchpoints” includes interactions you can control and MANY you can only influence (conversations between friends about your company or product is part of their customer experience).
2) Customer experiences are chronological. From thier view they learn about you, try you out, buy, use your product or serivce to solve their need, and evolve in their needs - one step before the next.
3) Customer experiences include both the tangible (product, process) and the intangible (emotional). I hear some people say, “It’s not the product; it’s the experience.” I say how can you separate them? Is a Starbucks “experience” complete without the coffee?
4) Perhaps most importantly, I love that Dirk mentioned solving a need. It’s too easy to focus on besting competitors, or get trapped into thinking more (service, speed, etc) is always better. The real question is DID YOU HELP ME SOLVE MY NEED?
‘Nuf said. Thanks Dirk, and thanks Bernhard for the great post.
Linda Ireland
Jul 18th, 2008
Reply to “UXmatters: Towards a definition of experience design and a definition of customer experience”