IDEO has released a Human Centered Design Toolkit that is the result of  a project funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The BMGF brought together four organizations —IDEO, IDE, Heifer International, and ICRW—to partner in the creation of a method for guiding innovation and design for smallholder farmers.

It contains the elements to Human-Centered Design, a process used for decades to create new solutions for multi-national corporations. This toolkit has been designed to hear the needs of smallholder farmers in new ways, create innovative solutions to meet these needs, and deliver solutions with financial sustainability in mind.

While many elements of the toolkit are specifically tailored towards the specific questions one faces when innovating with and for smallholder farmers, it is a valuable collection that makes the sometimes vague human centered design process more concrete and therefore transferable and reproducible.

What I really like about this toolkit is that it differentiates between the design team and the facilitators. I think this differentiation and the active nomination of facilitators is one of the unique aspects in design processes and the transfer of design knowledge.

I see a lot of potential to create Human Centered Design Toolkits a specific company and certain industries. It is really helpful to narrow the focus and create a human centered design toolkit for the automotive industry, telecommunications industry or financial service industry.

More information about the toolkit

[via Nick Marsh]

 

 

Posted in checklist, design thinking, human centered design, innovation, methods | Permalink | No Comments »

It is easy to focus on creating always better and more differentiated products and services when designing for remarkable customer experiences. Maybe it is simply human, that we tend to not look at situations when a product or service fails (think positive!) your customer’s loyalty will be negatively impacted.

I see a huge opportunity for improvement and a chance to create remarkable experiences that create word-of-mouth marketing in situations when products and services fails – if sophisticated service recovery programs are in place.

Can you imagine one of your customers telling a friend:

"You know, the product (or service) of company XYZ broke down the other day. But when I contacted the company, they did everything possible to solve the problem in a fast and friendly manner and now it is fixed. I understand problems can happen, but I feel that this company is taking care of me."

Every service (human or technology driven) as well as product will eventually fail one day and put your customer in a uncomfortable situation. Smart organizations will understand this and develop a service recovery program which ensures that their customers are satisfied even after things have gone wrong.

When organizations plan to implement recovery programs it is helpful to differentiate between (1) the strategic initiatives that should be in place before the actual problem occurs and (2) the tactical activities that should happen after a problem has occurred and the customer contacted the company.

Let’s start with the strategic initiatives that will ensure that the right environment for remarkable service recovery is in place.

Anticipate the needs for recovery

Whenever you roll out a product or service, the people related with it are probably well aware of potential problems or obstacles that might occur. It is probably not so much arrogance than probably more wishful thinking that limits the ability of companies to foresee potential problems with a product. Accepting that even the best designed product or service will fail one day in specific situations is the first step. Anticipating potential problems will help organizations to be prepared when the first customer contacts the company with a problem.

Build an organization that is fast in decision making, and fast to response.

One of the key success factors to win back customers and restore their satisfaction is to act fast. While your front-line employees might be working hard (and fast) already, the whole organization that deals with service recovery has to be “designed for agility”. This includes clear escalation and decision-making processes. One key principle should be that the fastest decision-making happens when the front-line employee can make the decision. So the real goal is not to define better escalation processes, but to define processes that empower employees so that escalation processes are not necessary anymore.

Empower front-line employees

In most companies, the employees that are actually interacting with customers are the ones that receive the lowest salary in an organization. While increasing the salaries (compared to other competitors) is one way to attract and retain talent that is able to deliver exceptional service, empowering employees and giving them the freedom to do whatever is necessary to ensure that customers are satisfied is probably even more economically meaningful.

Train employees

Ensure that your training program includes not just lessons on delivering service when everything works out as planned but also to include lessons that teach employees to improvise or to set recovery programs into action if something goes wrong.

While these strategic initiatives are important to define the long-term direction of your service recovery programs, the "moment of truth" happens when a customer contacts a company and interacts with an employee to discuss the problem and possible solutions.

In these moments the following seven rules should be applied by employees that are actually interacting with your customers:

1. Acknowledgement

Acknowledge that there is a problem. It doesn’t matter whether the customer didn’t understand certain aspects that are obvious from an organization’s perspective. He is the one that has a problem and if you want to keep this customer he needs to be taken serious. If one tries to convince customers that there is no problem, you are actually telling them they are stupid. This applies also to situations when the customer is following the wrong steps to perform a task – never blame the customer.

2. Empathy

Understand the problem from a customer’s point of view and also understand that he might be upset after a problem has occurred. While it is not necessary to listen to a customer when he starts cursing at employees, front-line employees should try to create an atmosphere that supports and enables a positive solution of a problem. Confronting the customer with his anger and frustration will not lead to an escalation of the problem, communicating that one can understand his situation will.

3. Apology

Saying sorry in the name of the company occurred is essential. Whether the employee should apologize in his name or in the name of his company depends on the context of the service recovery. If the employee (or a direct colleague) was involved when the problem occurred, he should apologize for himself. If the employee is in a call-center and a problem happened at a completely different location in the organization, he should apologize in the name of the organization – everything else is not authentic.

4. Own the problem

Taking ownership of the problem by the employee that is confronted with the problem (no matter in what position he is in) ensures that customers feel that they are taken care of. And even if your job is not to resolve the problem ultimately, telling customers to go somewhere else (and not "bringing" them there) sends the message that they don’t care.

5. Fix The Problem

Obviously fixing or at leasing trying to fix the problem for the customer should be the top priority. This might be easy in some situations (maybe just replacing the defect product) it becomes a challenge when the problem is not a real problem. Let’s say the customer was simply using the product in a wrong way, fixing the problem in such a situation means re-educating the customer so that he uses the product or service in the supposed way.

6. Provide assurance

When Customers get in touch with you to report a problem and to demand a fix their most important need is to be taken serious. Giving them a feeling of assurance that the problem will be sorted out and should (hopefully) not occur again will leave a professional impression and help rebuild the customer’s confidence a company’s products and services.

7. Provide compensation

If you want to make angry customers happy, give them money. Providing a refund, token or other compensation depending on the severity of the problem remains to be a powerful method for service recovery. Increasing the amount of money that a company pays to company to fix problems requires a rigorous control but it can indeed ensure that your customers are satisfied. It is important to note that just "handing out money" is not enough – if money is handed out unfriendly or even worse, in a tedious discussion with the customers, satisfaction will not be restored.

References:

Hart, C.W.L.; Heskett, J.L.; Sasser, W.E.: The profitable act of service recovery. Harvard Business Review 68 (4), 1990, pp, 148–156

Johnston, R.; Michel, S.: Three outcomes of service recovery: Customer recovery, process recovery and employee recovery, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 28 (4), 2008, pp. 79 – 99

Posted in checklist, service design | Permalink | 1 Comment »

One essential task in new product and service development is to create superior value for the customer and exceed customer’s expectations. The question what creates value for a customer is a difficult one and can certainly not be answered easily. The framework presented in the paper “Customer Value Creation: A Practical Framework” written by J. Brock Smith and Mark Colgate seems like a valuable tool to answer these questions.

Creation of value for customers is a critical task for marketers, particularly when developing new products and services or starting new businesses. This paper presents a new conceptual framework for marketers to ponder when exploring ways to distinguish themselves, in the eyes of the customer, from others in the marketplace. This framework is built on the strengths of existing frameworks. Possible applications of the framework in designing marketing strategy, recognizing new product opportunities, and enhancing product concept specifications are discussed.

They have developed a framework that includes several dimensions of customer value that adopts a strategic orientation in that the focus is on identifying categories of value that could differentiate offerings and not on identifying all of the specific benefits and sacrifices that may be perceived by consumers or customers. The framework is applicable to consumer and business contexts, and goods as well as services.

The four types of value that have been identified are

Functional/instrumental
Functional/instrumental value is concerned with the extent to which a product (good or service) has desired characteristics, is useful, or performs a desired function.

Experiential/hedonic
Experiential/hedonic value is concerned with the extent to which a product creates appropriate experiences, feelings, and emotions for the customer.

Symbolic/expressive
Symbolic/expressive value is concerned with the extent to which customers attach or associate psychological meaning to a product.

Cost/sacrifice value
Consumers and customers also try to minimize the costs and other sacrifices that may be involved in the purchase, ownership, and use of a product. Cost/sacrifice value is concerned with these transaction costs.

In the next step they identify five sources of customer value information, products, interactions, environment, ownership/possession transfer and identify possible value aspects for each type and source of customer value. The result are four pages of value aspects.

I have been looking for such a comprehensive framework already for quite a while because such a framework is indeed helpful in identifying the value of new products and services in order to derive their chances of becoming a successful new product or service. And I completely agree with the authors conclusion:

The customer value creation strategy framework developed in this paper offers a useful tool for specifying and illustrating value creation strategies, illustrating brand and organization positioning, identifying opportunities for new value creation propositions, and suggesting enhancements to the value propositions of existing products.

Download the full article here.

Posted in checklist, customer value | Permalink | 1 Comment »

Opinions on the degree of required formalization for innovation processes vary widely. While one group argues that innovation can not be engineered because it is the outcome of a creative processes others belief that it is possible to set-up highly formalized processes that lead to innovative products and services. No matter what group one belongs to, it is reasonable to use well-established methods and tools that support in innovation development.

“Market research methods for innovation development (via archive.org)” is a paper written by Dennis List from the University of South Australia which looks at the variety of established and emerging market research methods for researching innovations. The methods are grouped into (1) understanding customers, (2) idea generation, (3) concept testing and (4) estimating market size, growth and composition. The methods for each group are:

Understanding customers

• Empathic Design
• Observation
• Customer visits
• Ethnography
• Alien interviewing
• ZMET (Metaphor Elicitation)
• Codiscovery conference
• Information acceleration

Generating Ideas

• Brainstorming and synectics
• Templates of product change
• Morphological analysis
• TRIZ
• Nominal group technique (NGT)
• Scenario planning
• Lead users
• Secondary research
• Lateral Thinking
• Ignoring customers

Concept Testing

• Storyboarding
• Customer Idealized Design
• Charrette
• Usability testing
• Consumer clinics
• A-B testing (formal experiments)
• Consensus groups
• House of Quality / QFD

Estimating market size, growth and composition

• Test marketing
• Delphi method
• Expeditionary marketing
• Tracking surveys
• Simulation
• Forecasting
• Monitoring, response techniques

Each of the methods is explained briefly and limitations are discussed. Most important the article provides further references for each of the methods.

Download the full paper via archive.org.

Posted in checklist, innovation, methods | Permalink | No Comments »

“Design Meets Research” is an article in published by AIGA, the American Institute of Graphic Arts which discusses the challenges when market research methods are used for validating design decisions.

There is a group of brand consultants and cultural anthropologists alike that believe now that it is not the actual research itself that is the problem. It is rather about how research is often misused, what type of design concepts and stimulus are tested, and how data is analyzed that is most often at fault. When used correctly, research shouldn’t stifle creativity but rather offer designers stronger inspiration and focus.

The authors further explain the advantages and challenges of modern market research methods (ethnography, focus groups, quantitative eye tracking, online testing) and deduce 6 golden rules for market research.

1. Focus on testing communication effectiveness vs. design appeal.
2. When testing, make allowances for familiarity.
3. Market research is an art, not a science.
4. Focus on what consumers like about the brand or product first.
5. More is definitely merrier. Do not test designs in isolation.
6. Never ask consumers how they would improve a design.

Read the full article.

Posted in checklist, customer insight, ethnography | Permalink | No Comments »